Astalini, A., Darmaji, D., Kurniawan, D. A., & Chen, D. (2021). Students' perceptions of mathematical physics e-module on multiple integral material. Journal of Education Technology, 5(4), 531–538. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v5i4.33600
Astalini, A., Darmaji, D., Kurniawan, D. A., & Ramadhanti, A. (2022). Mathematical physics e-module: Study of students’ perception based on gender. Journal of Education Technology, 6(1), 91–101. https://doi.org/10.23887/jet.v6i1.42233
Chala, A. A., Kedir, I., & Wami, S. (2020). Secondary school students’ beliefs towards learning physics and its influencing factors. Research on Humanities and Social Sciences, 10(7), 33–51. https://doi.org/10.7176/RHSS/10-7-05
Efwinda, S., Haryanto, Z., Sulaeman, N. F., & Nuryadin, A. (2023). Self-efficacy of PCK: An exploration of Indonesian prospective physics teacher perspectives. Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia Gemilang, 3(2), 230–241. https://doi.org/10.52889/jpig.v3i2.252
Gola, N., Subiki, S., & Nuraini, L. (2022). Profil respon siswa penggunaan e-modul fisika berbasis android (ANDROMO). Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika, 11(2), 53–58.
Hoke, M., Dungus, F., & Makahinda, T. (2021). Pengaruh model pembelajaran PBL (problem based learning) berbantuan alat peraga terhadap hasil belajar pada materi gaya pegas. Jurnal Pendidikan Fisika Charm Sains, 2(3), 189–195.
Sari, D., Bektiarso, S., & Lesmono, A. D. (2022). Analysis the effect of problem based approaches and media experiment on learning interest and critical thinking using structural equation modeling. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Fisika, 10(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.20527/bipf.v10i1.10141
Shamshin, A. (2021). Development and use of the program of automatic problem solving when conducting practical classes in physics at the university. ScienceRise: Pedagogical Education, 5(44), 23–29. https://doi.org/10.15527/bipf.v10i1.10141
Uden, L., Sulaiman, F., & Lamun, R. F. (2022). Factors influencing students’ attitudes and readiness towards active online learning in physics. Education Sciences, 12(11), 746. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12110746
Uwambajimana, S., Minani, E., Mollel, A. D., & Nyirahabimana, P. (2023). The impact of using PhET simulation on conceptual understanding of electrostatics within selected secondary schools of Muhanga District, Rwanda. Journal of Mathematics and Science Teacher, 3(2), em045. https://doi.org/10.29333/mathsciteacher/13595
Whitcomb, K. M., Maries, A., & Singh, C. (2023). Progression in self-efficacy, interest, identity, sense of belonging, perceived recognition and effectiveness of peer interaction of physics majors and comparison with non-majors and Ph.D. students. Research in Science Education, 53, 525–539. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-022-10068-4
Wibowo, F. C., Nasbey, H., Sanjaya, L. A., & Darman, D. R. (2020). Development of game open online physics instructional (GOOPI) for improving 21st-century careers: Creativity skill (21-CC:CS). International Journal of Advanced Trends in Computer Science and Engineering, 9(3), 3291–3298. https://doi.org/10.30534/ijatcse/2020/20932020
Wulandari, W. N., Ardhanariswari, W. E., Khalidah, H. I., & Setiaji, B. (2021). Analysis of high school students’ learning difficulties in understanding the mechanics concept. IMPULSE: Journal of Research and Innovation in Physics Education, 1(2), 72–79.
Zuhdi, M., Makhrus, M., Wahyudi, W., ‘Ardhuha, J., Susilawati, S., & Raharjo, P. (2021). Pelatihan fisika aeromodelling untuk siswa SMA Negeri 1 Mataram. Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Sains Indonesia (JPMSI), 3(2), 110–113. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpmsi.v3i2.139
Alayed, T., Sasa, T., Alayed, S. I., Alamayreh, R., Abuhazeem, T., & Miri, O. (2022). The benefits and drawbacks students at the applied science private university find in physics laboratories. Journal of Southwest Jiaotong University, 57(5), 546–554. https://doi.org/10.35741/issn.0258-2724.57.5.43
Arcoverde, Â. R. dos R., Boruchovitch, E., Góes, N. M., & Acee, T. W. (2022). Self-regulated learning of Natural Sciences and Mathematics future teachers: Learning strategies, self-efficacy, and socio-demographic factors. Psicologia: Reflexão e Crítica, 35(1), e203. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41155-021-00203-x
Baptista, M., Freire, S., & Freire, A. M. (2020). Science teachers’ beliefs and practices: Collaboration as a trigger of change. Acta Scientiae, 22(1), 2–22. https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.5595
Charles, T., & Gwilliam, C. (2023). The effect of automated error message feedback on undergraduate physics students learning python: Reducing anxiety and building confidence. Journal for STEM Education Research, 6(3), 326–357. https://doi.org/10.1007/s41979-022-00084-4
Chiofalo, M. L., Foti, C., Michelini, M., Santi, L., & Stefanel, A. (2022). Games for teaching/learning quantum mechanics: A pilot study with high-school students. Education Sciences, 12(7), 446. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12070446
Dawadi, S. (2023). Perceptions of students toward physics learning strategies at the secondary level. Pragyaratna, 5(1), 74–88.
Dou, R., & Zwolak, J. P. (2019). Practitioner’s guide to social network analysis: Examining physics anxiety in an active-learning setting. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(2), 020105. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.15.020105
Ellianawati, E., Subali, B., Khotimah, S. N., & Cholila, M. (2021). Profile of reasoning ability and reduction of mathematical anxiety in analogy-based physics learning. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1918(5), 052051. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1918/5/052051
Leone, M., & Rinaudo, M. (2020). Should the history of physics be rated X? A survey of physics teachers’ expectations. Physics Education, 55(3), 035013. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6552/ab73d1
Malespina, A., & Singh, C. (2022). Gender differences in test anxiety and self-efficacy: Why instructors should emphasize low-stakes formative assessments in physics courses. European Journal of Physics, 43(3), 035701. https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6404/ac51b1
Phanphech, P., Tanitteerapan, T., Mungkung, N., Arunrungrusmi, S., Chunkul, C., Songruk, A., Yuji, T., & Kinoshita, H. (2022). An analysis of student anxiety affecting on online learning on conceptual applications in physics: Synchronous vs. asynchronous learning. Education Sciences, 12(4), 278. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci12040278
Prasetya, I. E., Yusuf, M., & Buhungo, T. J. (2022). Description of students learning motivation towards the use of PhET simulation in physics online learning in terms of self-efficacy and anxiety levels. Jurnal Pijar MIPA, 17(1), 23–27. https://doi.org/10.29303/jpm.v17i1.3218
Putranta, H., & Jumadi. (2019). Physics teacher efforts of Islamic high school in Yogyakarta to minimize students' anxiety when facing the assessment of physics learning outcomes. Journal for the Education of Gifted Young Scientists, 7(2), 119–136. http://dx.doi.org/10.17478/jegys.552091
Stella, M. (2020). Forma mentis networks reconstruct how Italian high schoolers and international STEM experts perceive teachers, students, scientists, and school. Education Sciences, 10(1), 17. https://doi.org/10.3390/educsci10010017
Taibu, R., & Ferrari-Bridgers, F. (2020). Physics language anxiety among students in introductory physics course. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 16(4), em1835. https://doi.org/10.29333/ejmste/111993
Werth, A., Oliver, K., West, C. G., & Lewandowski, H. J. (2022). Assessing student engagement with teamwork in an online, large-enrollment course-based undergraduate research experience in physics. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 18(2), 020128. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevPhysEducRes.18.020128
Westbroek, H. B., van Rens, L., van den Berg, E., & Janssen, F. (2020). A practical approach to assessment for learning and differentiated instruction. International Journal of Science Education, 42(6), 955–976. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2020.1744044